Building permit FFCAKK01
Publicada el 2026-07-31
Descripción de la oferta
Building permit changes the city Is requesting. I have a chief architect drawing and have been trying to get the plans approved with the city and they are using blue beam markup. I need help getting the plans approved and the requested changes completed to their specifications. I tried using PDF to modify the files but the city keeps rejecting with notes. I had grok analyze the plans and this is what it said. Here is your complete, ready-to-print Written Response Letter. Instructions (Very Important) Copy everything below the line. Paste it into Google Docs or Microsoft Word. Use Arial font, size 11. Add your signature at the bottom (you can sign digitally or print and sign by hand). Export/Save as PDF. Name the file: Response to PC 4 Comments – BLDR-2025-0766 – May 27 2026.pdf CITY OF FULLERTON Building & Safety Department Response to Plan Check Comments – PC 4 Permit No.: BLDR-2025-0766 Project Address: 519 S. Eadington Ave, Fullerton, CA 92833 Owner / Applicant: Christina Alosi (Owner-Builder) Designer: Kyle Keith Date: May 27, 2026 To Whom It May Concern: This letter provides a formal written response to the red-lined plan comments dated May 27, 2026 for the above-referenced permit. All corrections have been addressed on the revised plans. The specific sheet number and note/detail reference are listed below for each comment. Response to Comments: 1. Property Line Dimensions & Right-of-Way (Priscillad – repeated) Addressed on: Sheet P-1 (Site Plan) All property lines and dimensions are taken directly from the recorded Tract Map for Tract No. 1814, Lot 11 (December 1954, Book 74, Page 10 – copy attached to this submittal). A clear table showing front, rear, and side dimensions plus right-of-way information (60.00' total width, 30.00' from property line to centerline) has been added in the lower right corner of Sheet P-1. North arrow has been added to all sheets. 2. Deck Height Clarification (JiYeon) Addressed on: Sheets P-2 and P-3 Added clear notes on both sheets showing: Finished deck surface elevation Finished ground elevation Deck height above finished grade = 18 inches Guardrails are not required because deck height is less than 30" per R312.1. 3. Stair Details (Comment 27) Addressed on: Sheet P-2 Three risers at 6" each (maximum allowed 7¾"), 11" tread depth, and 1" nosing projection provided per IRC R311.7.5 and Exception 1. 4. Framing & Structural Clarifications (JiYeon) Addressed on: Sheet P-4 Footing depth: 12" below finished grade with two #4 rebar continuous Deck beams: Double 2x12 PT #2 (glued and bolted with ½" galvanized carriage bolts @ 24" o.c.) Post base: Simpson ABU44Z cast into footing; beam connected with Simpson CC4Z post cap Rim joist changed to solid sawn 2x10 PT (no engineered lumber used) No concrete slab under deck – open construction All footings placed on firm, undisturbed soil or compacted fill 5. General Requirements b. Written response provided (this letter) with sheet and note references. c. Waste Management Plan: Note added on Sheet P-0 – “MG Disposal will be used for construction waste management for this project.” d. NPDES / Stormwater BMP notes added to Sheets P-1 and P-4. e. AQMD notification completed – Zinsser B-I-N primer checklist previously submitted. All corrections are clouded in red on the revised plans for easy identification. Final drawings will be signed by the designer prior to permit issuance.
Skills
Fuente original: freelancer